Approval Pileup
Ordinary work waits for a leader because the boundaries of delegated authority are unclear. The same kinds of decisions return to the same inbox.
What it looks like.
An employee sends a familiar customer request to the owner for approval. The owner asks for background that was missing from the message, while the employee waits instead of taking the next step.
What it costs the team.
Leaders repeatedly assemble context for predictable decisions, and staff learn to escalate rather than exercise judgment. Work moves at the pace of whoever holds the approval queue.

A routine request joins the owner’s queue
Here is one way the work could move, with a person handling the decisions that need judgment.

Assemble the request, relevant facts, and the decision being asked for.
Check the case against explicit authority rules and defined limits.
Route true exceptions to the authorized decision-maker with the necessary context.
Record the decision and reasoning for review before changing any authority rule.
What a person still owns.

- Set delegated authority boundaries and approve policy changes.
- Decide material exceptions, people matters, and risk acceptance.
- Approve commitments that exceed the delegated limit.
A useful first step.
Review a small set of recurring approvals. Write down the evidence needed and the boundary that separates a routine case from an exception.
How we choose the right change ↗Start with one workflow.
No need to choose an AI tool or design a solution first. Bring the work you want to improve.
We’ll agree on scope and pricing before any project begins.
Talk to a nerd.
Bring one recurring task, request, or handoff. We’ll look at where it gets stuck and whether there’s a useful next step.
Open the booking calendarChoose a time in Google Calendar. Live availability and your time zone appear there.